The establishment does not really care about human rights, and that includes gay rights. They use gay rights as a way to divide the nation, and it is an issue that politicians use to get elected. Gay rights to the establishment is just a pawn, that moves across the board for the establishment's agenda. That is to get the candidate they see that will run the country the way they want it to run, and that is to bankrupt this nation from being a independent nation to a dependent nation. Gay rights to them is more about accomplishing their agenda, rather than human rights. The establishment does not believe in human rights, but they believe in human depopulation. And gay rights is just a pawn to the establishment in reaching their objective of human depopulation.
A right side, and a left side always fighter over gay rights. The right side, conservative-republican, are against people being gay, and the left side, liberal-democratic, support people that are gay. People at the local level in society may actually care about the gay issue, whereas people at the national level in society may not care about the gay issue. To them it is another way for them to get into office. If a person on the conservative side is running in for president, then it can be against people for being gay. If a person on the liberal side running for president, then it can be for gay people. No matter which side ends up winning, gay rights have not all been fulfill. Gay rights is just a pawn in the establishments agenda, and the DOD cutting military benefits is an example of that.
You have President Obama pushing for gay rights, and you have the DOD wanting to cut military benefits for people being gay. Both President Obama, and the DOD work for the establishment. Without money, then neither one can push their agenda. What their two opposite ideas does is divide the country, so they can have votes to be the establishment's puppets, that come across as representatives to the people.
My believe on why the DOD is cutting military benefits for the gay is they do not have enough money from the establishment to provide gay couples their benefits, but they cannot tell the American public that. That will reveal to the tax payers that the establishment is their boss, so they state the reason for cutting for military benefits to certain couples was because of their sexual orientation. The DOD cutting benefits from gay couples has really nothing to do with their sexual orientation, but it has to do with the establishment cutting back their funding. Hm maybe for the demand of heroine could go up, then they may have enough money to give to gay people.
Monday, February 20, 2012
Friday, February 17, 2012
"My Thoughts of the Moment"
Last few days I have gotten the blogging bug, and I did not expect to get it at this time. Around summer time, or after my semester being over is when I get in the mood to blog. During the semester I write so much for school, that it is hard to concentrate writing what I want to write about.
What I want to write about could be anything, and it sometimes does not have an objective like a research paper assigned for a course. Writing without an objective can be interesting, because I do not know how my blogging will end up when I began it. Along the way of blogging my mind could be just pouring interesting stuff through my fingers as I type.
But the last few days I have been blogging about things that do have an objective, and I have free flow my mind in blogging as well. I remember when I begin to blog about four years ago to become a better writer for grad school, but now I do it for other reasons. I still do it to improve as a writer, but I also do it for the love of it, and also do it to relax as well. I also still like the fact of millions of people that I will never meet will end up reading it. This blog could end up being the least interesting for others, or it can be interesting as well.
What I want to write about could be anything, and it sometimes does not have an objective like a research paper assigned for a course. Writing without an objective can be interesting, because I do not know how my blogging will end up when I began it. Along the way of blogging my mind could be just pouring interesting stuff through my fingers as I type.
But the last few days I have been blogging about things that do have an objective, and I have free flow my mind in blogging as well. I remember when I begin to blog about four years ago to become a better writer for grad school, but now I do it for other reasons. I still do it to improve as a writer, but I also do it for the love of it, and also do it to relax as well. I also still like the fact of millions of people that I will never meet will end up reading it. This blog could end up being the least interesting for others, or it can be interesting as well.
"My Opinions as of Lately"
Jeremy Lin a Legend Already?
I have only seen Jeremy Lin play through highlights, because I hear people mentioning him on Facebook. And I read some of the headlines sportswriters make to promote him. Some people have already put him on legendary status for having a early success in his NBA career, but will they say the same thing when he struggles? When Lin struggles, people will go from calling him legend to calling him a scrub. He is going to struggle, because teams will now study him a lot harder to find weakness to exploit.
I will agree with someone that he is a good player, but I would not refer to him as a legend of the game. The only thing Lin has done is get to a hot start as a starter, and that is a good thing. It gets his confidence up, and it gives more opportunity to play. With him having more opportunity to play, other teams will have more footage of him playing to figure out his weakness. It's going to happen, because its happened to all of the legends of the NBA. Its even happen to Michael Jordan, and he learned to turn his weakness into a strength. Can Lin do the same thing when he struggles? If he can't, then how will people feel about him when he cannot overcome his struggles in the game? Then again he may overcome his struggles, because of his past experiences of struggling. Maybe what makes him a good player is his drive for success, and Jordan had that.
I think Lin could be a legend if he continues to improve his game to make it harder for teams to figure out his weaknesses, but I am not ready to call him that yet. I think he needs to win a few championships before he can have the word legend associated with his name.
Big Problem in America
No one in the major media is talking about American's big problem, because their views come from a secular point that's fed to them daily. Average Americans think that America's problems will be fixed through elections at local, and national level. But some politicians may not know what America's biggest problem is, or they are afraid to talk about it. The big problem that I am blogging about is amount of evangelism that goes on in this country, and its percentages is in the single digit. That percentage is very sad, because Americans live in the most free nation of this world. Now I do not ignore America's freedoms is being taken away, but even with that we are still the most free nation of this world. So America does not really have any excuse for evangelism's percentage being in the single digits.
Reason why I think lack of Evangelism in America is a big problem, because people that do not follow God will end having a nation against God. A nation against God has been going on at least in the last 50 years, and it has not gotten better. Christians thought it was getting better when America's economy was thriving under Reagan, but having more materials really has nothing to do with evangelism. If it did, than the rich young ruler would not have to give up his possessions to follow Jesus. Having more materials maybe one of the reasons why America has drifted away from God, but there has also been people that have used what God gave them to bless others to have an opportunity to evangelize. Not everyone does that, or America's evangelism percentage would be higher than single digits.
There's a correlation between lack of evangelism in America, and America's immorality that is very high. Lack of evangelism means a lack of God being the center point of people's lives, and lack of God in people's lives leads to high immorality. Problems in America like abortion, and sex outside of marriage are linked to lack of God being the center point of people's lives. Lack of God being the center point of people's lives continues throughout America, because most believers are not obeying Christ's command of the Great Commission. They maybe teaching God's word to other believers, but that is only obeying half the Great Commission. Willingly obeying half of the Great Commission is disobeying it, so most believers are just as responsible for America's high immorality.
If evangelism's percentage in America continues to get smaller, than America's direction will not change for the better. Lack of evangelism in America is a big problem.
Which MMA fighter that has not won a title match that I would watch no matter what
Yesterday I read an article online that asked the question of which fighters people would pay no matter what, and most fighter mention in the article were at least champions. After I read that article I asked myself the same question of which fighter I would pay to see no matter what, but I went deeper with that question by asking which fighter I would pay to see that has not won a title match yet. Various fighters came to mind like Diego Sanchez, Chris Leben, Michael Bisping, Yoshido Akiyama, Roy Nelson, and Chael Sonnen. Out of those fighters I mention of who I would watch no matter what, I would have to say its Diego Sanchez. Here are reasons why.
The reason is that I have always been a fan of Diego Sanchez's style, because in all of his fights he puts constant pressure, and in most of his fights they usually go the distance if he cannot finish his opponents with ground and pound. With Sanchez's will, and constant offensive pressure, those things make him an exciting fighter to watch no matter what. And another reason is that makes Sanchez that kind of fighter is that he does not have a lot of explosion when compare to an elite athlete like St.Pierre, but Sanchez makes the most of what he has got. That is heart, and it makes up a lot of whatever he does not have like explosion. Diego's constant pressure, his heart, and determination not to quit fights are reasons why he is the fighter I would watch no matter what.
I have only seen Jeremy Lin play through highlights, because I hear people mentioning him on Facebook. And I read some of the headlines sportswriters make to promote him. Some people have already put him on legendary status for having a early success in his NBA career, but will they say the same thing when he struggles? When Lin struggles, people will go from calling him legend to calling him a scrub. He is going to struggle, because teams will now study him a lot harder to find weakness to exploit.
I will agree with someone that he is a good player, but I would not refer to him as a legend of the game. The only thing Lin has done is get to a hot start as a starter, and that is a good thing. It gets his confidence up, and it gives more opportunity to play. With him having more opportunity to play, other teams will have more footage of him playing to figure out his weakness. It's going to happen, because its happened to all of the legends of the NBA. Its even happen to Michael Jordan, and he learned to turn his weakness into a strength. Can Lin do the same thing when he struggles? If he can't, then how will people feel about him when he cannot overcome his struggles in the game? Then again he may overcome his struggles, because of his past experiences of struggling. Maybe what makes him a good player is his drive for success, and Jordan had that.
I think Lin could be a legend if he continues to improve his game to make it harder for teams to figure out his weaknesses, but I am not ready to call him that yet. I think he needs to win a few championships before he can have the word legend associated with his name.
Big Problem in America
No one in the major media is talking about American's big problem, because their views come from a secular point that's fed to them daily. Average Americans think that America's problems will be fixed through elections at local, and national level. But some politicians may not know what America's biggest problem is, or they are afraid to talk about it. The big problem that I am blogging about is amount of evangelism that goes on in this country, and its percentages is in the single digit. That percentage is very sad, because Americans live in the most free nation of this world. Now I do not ignore America's freedoms is being taken away, but even with that we are still the most free nation of this world. So America does not really have any excuse for evangelism's percentage being in the single digits.
Reason why I think lack of Evangelism in America is a big problem, because people that do not follow God will end having a nation against God. A nation against God has been going on at least in the last 50 years, and it has not gotten better. Christians thought it was getting better when America's economy was thriving under Reagan, but having more materials really has nothing to do with evangelism. If it did, than the rich young ruler would not have to give up his possessions to follow Jesus. Having more materials maybe one of the reasons why America has drifted away from God, but there has also been people that have used what God gave them to bless others to have an opportunity to evangelize. Not everyone does that, or America's evangelism percentage would be higher than single digits.
There's a correlation between lack of evangelism in America, and America's immorality that is very high. Lack of evangelism means a lack of God being the center point of people's lives, and lack of God in people's lives leads to high immorality. Problems in America like abortion, and sex outside of marriage are linked to lack of God being the center point of people's lives. Lack of God being the center point of people's lives continues throughout America, because most believers are not obeying Christ's command of the Great Commission. They maybe teaching God's word to other believers, but that is only obeying half the Great Commission. Willingly obeying half of the Great Commission is disobeying it, so most believers are just as responsible for America's high immorality.
If evangelism's percentage in America continues to get smaller, than America's direction will not change for the better. Lack of evangelism in America is a big problem.
Which MMA fighter that has not won a title match that I would watch no matter what
Yesterday I read an article online that asked the question of which fighters people would pay no matter what, and most fighter mention in the article were at least champions. After I read that article I asked myself the same question of which fighter I would pay to see no matter what, but I went deeper with that question by asking which fighter I would pay to see that has not won a title match yet. Various fighters came to mind like Diego Sanchez, Chris Leben, Michael Bisping, Yoshido Akiyama, Roy Nelson, and Chael Sonnen. Out of those fighters I mention of who I would watch no matter what, I would have to say its Diego Sanchez. Here are reasons why.
The reason is that I have always been a fan of Diego Sanchez's style, because in all of his fights he puts constant pressure, and in most of his fights they usually go the distance if he cannot finish his opponents with ground and pound. With Sanchez's will, and constant offensive pressure, those things make him an exciting fighter to watch no matter what. And another reason is that makes Sanchez that kind of fighter is that he does not have a lot of explosion when compare to an elite athlete like St.Pierre, but Sanchez makes the most of what he has got. That is heart, and it makes up a lot of whatever he does not have like explosion. Diego's constant pressure, his heart, and determination not to quit fights are reasons why he is the fighter I would watch no matter what.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
"Learning to Stay Away From Negative People"
One of the things God has taught me in the last couple of months is the importance of surrounding yourself with good friends, because it is a way to keep negative people out. Negative people are the ones that could never get out of a wet paper bag, because they just talk about getting out. While they do that, they are also making excuses on why they are not successful. And they also talk bad about the ones that are successful, and they keep others around them down with them. So the ways negative people act are the reasons why I learn to stay away from them.
I learned that all areas in life you will always have negative people, and that is especially true in areas like church. For example last Sunday when I was teaching Sunday School, someone came to my class before it started to what seems like he was trying to check on me. We had a dialogue made of questions, and one of them was how many students did I have? I threw out a number that was consistent to what we have, which I answered with the number eight. His responds to that was he says I was going to have probably two, because of the weather being cold. If I had two students, than I would have still been pleased with it. So, just because you are in church does not mean you escaped from negativity.
If people are always complaining, making excuses of not being successful, gossiping about others, then those are good signs of that person to stay away from that person. You could still be friends with that person, because that is what Christ would want you to do. But you can still keep a distance away from them to stay away from negativity, or anything they do that causes you to loss your trust with them.
I learned that all areas in life you will always have negative people, and that is especially true in areas like church. For example last Sunday when I was teaching Sunday School, someone came to my class before it started to what seems like he was trying to check on me. We had a dialogue made of questions, and one of them was how many students did I have? I threw out a number that was consistent to what we have, which I answered with the number eight. His responds to that was he says I was going to have probably two, because of the weather being cold. If I had two students, than I would have still been pleased with it. So, just because you are in church does not mean you escaped from negativity.
If people are always complaining, making excuses of not being successful, gossiping about others, then those are good signs of that person to stay away from that person. You could still be friends with that person, because that is what Christ would want you to do. But you can still keep a distance away from them to stay away from negativity, or anything they do that causes you to loss your trust with them.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)